Microsoft Corp (MSFT)
Microsoft Corporation Corporate Governance Guidelines
Updated: July 1, 2013

Over the course of Microsoft's history, the Board of Directors has developed corporate governance policies and practices to help it fulfill its responsibilities to shareholders. These governance policies are memorialized in these guidelines to assure that the Board will have the necessary authority and practices in place to review and evaluate the Company's business operations and to make decisions that are independent of the Company's management.

The guidelines are subject to future refinement or changes as the Board may find necessary or advisable to achieve these objectives.

Role of the Board

Shareholders elect the Board to oversee management and to assure that shareholder long-term interests are served.  Through oversight, review, and counsel, the Board establishes and promotes Microsoft’s business and organizational objectives.  The Board oversees business affairs and integrity, works with management to determine the Company’s mission and long-term strategy, performs the annual Chief Executive Officer evaluation, oversees CEO succession planning, and oversees internal control over financial reporting and external audit.

The Board is responsible for overseeing risk management at the Company.  The Board exercises direct oversight of strategic risks to the Company and other risk areas not delegated to one of its committees. The Audit Committee reviews and assesses the Company’s processes to manage financial reporting risk and to manage investment, tax, and other financial risks.  It also reviews the Company’s policies for risk assessment and steps management has taken to control significant risks, except those delegated by the Board to other committees.  The Compensation Committee oversees compensation programs and policies and their effect on risk taking by management.  The Regulatory and Public Policy Committee oversees operational risks including those related to business continuity, security, privacy, and competition law related risks.  In each case, management periodically reports to the Board or relevant committee, which provides guidance on risk appetite, assessment and mitigation.  Each committee charged with risk oversight reports up to the Board on those matters.

The Board recognizes that the long-term interests of shareholders are advanced by responsibly addressing the concerns of other stakeholders including employees, customers, suppliers, government, and the public.

Board Composition and Selection; Independent Directors
  1. Board Size. The Board believes 8 to 11 members is an appropriate size based on the Company's present circumstances. The Board periodically evaluates whether a larger or smaller slate of directors would be preferable.
  2. Selection of Board Members.  The Company’s shareholders elect Board members annually.  The Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board director candidates for nomination and election at the annual shareholder meeting or for appointment to fill vacancies.  The Governance and Nominating Committee annually reviews with the Board the applicable skills and characteristics required of Board nominees in the context of current Board composition and Company circumstances.  In making its recommendations to the Board, the Governance and Nominating Committee considers, among other things, the qualifications of individual director candidates in light of the Board Membership Criteria described below.  The Governance and Nominating Committee may use a variety of sources, including executive search firms and shareholder recommendations, to identify director candidates.  The Committee retains any search firms and approves payment of their fees.  The Governance and Nominating Committee will consider candidates recommended by shareholders.  Shareholders wishing to suggest director candidates should submit their suggestions in writing to the attention of the Corporate Secretary of the Company, providing the candidate's name and qualifications for service as a Board member, a document signed by the candidate indicating the candidate's willingness to serve, if elected, and evidence of the shareholder's ownership of Company stock.  A shareholder wishing to nominate a candidate must do so formally by following the procedures described in Article 1 of the Company’s Bylaws.The Board nominates director candidates for election by the shareholders and fills any Board vacancies that occur between shareholder elections pursuant to the Company's Bylaws.
  3. Board Membership Criteria. The Governance and Nominating Committee works with the Board on an annual basis to determine the appropriate characteristics, skills, and experience for the Board as a whole and its individual members with the objective of having a Board with diverse backgrounds and experience in business, government, education, and public service. Characteristics expected of all directors include independence, integrity, high personal and professional ethics, sound business judgment, and the ability and willingness to commit sufficient time to the Board. In evaluating the suitability of individual Board members, the Board takes into account many factors, including general understanding of marketing, finance, and other disciplines relevant to the success of a large publicly traded company in today's business environment; understanding of the Company's business and technology; educational and professional background; personal accomplishment; and geographic, gender, age, and ethnic diversity. The Board evaluates each individual in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of recommending a group that can best perpetuate the success of the Company's business and represent shareholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment, using its diversity of experience. In determining whether to recommend a director for re-election, the Governance and Nominating Committee also considers the director's past attendance at meetings, participation in and contributions to the activities of the Board, and the results of the most recent Board self-evaluation.
  4. Board Composition – Mix of Management and Independent Directors. The Board intends that, except during periods of temporary vacancies, a substantial majority of its directors will be independent.  The Governance and Nominating Committee has established director independence guidelines to assist it in determining the independence of a director, which will either meet or be more restrictive than the definition of “independent director” in the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market, and applicable laws and regulations.  The Board will also consider all other relevant facts and circumstances bearing on independence.
  5. Term Limits. The Board does not believe it should limit the number of terms for which an individual may serve as a director. Directors who have served on the Board for an extended period of time are able to provide valuable insight into the operations and future of the Company based on their experience with and understanding of the Company's history, policies, and objectives. The Board believes that, as an alternative to term limits, it can ensure that the Board continues to evolve and adopt new viewpoints through the evaluation and nomination process described in these guidelines.
  6. Election of Directors. As provided in Article 2 of the Company’s Bylaws, in an uncontested election directors will be elected by the vote of the majority of the votes cast. In a contested election, the directors will be elected by the vote of a plurality of the votes cast.
  7. Retirement Policy. The Board believes that 75 is an appropriate retirement age for directors. Directors generally will not be nominated for re-election at any annual shareholder meeting following their 75th birthday.
  8. Directors with Significant Job Changes. The Board believes that any director who retires from his or her present employment, or who materially changes his or her position, should offer to resign from the Board. The Governance and Nominating Committee would evaluate whether the Board should accept the resignation based on a review of whether the individual continues to satisfy the Board's membership criteria in light of his or her new occupational status.
  9. CEO, Chairman, and Lead Independent Director. The Board selects the Company’s CEO and Chairman in the manner that it determines to be in the best interests of the Company’s shareholders.  The Board does not have a policy as to whether the Chairman should be an independent director, an affiliated director, or a member of management.  When the Chairman is an affiliated director or a member of Company management, or when the independent directors determine that it is in the best interests of the Company, the independent directors will annually appoint from among themselves a Lead Independent Director.  The Lead Independent Director coordinates the activities of the independent directors and is authorized to call meetings of the independent directors, coordinates with the CEO and Corporate Secretary to set the agenda for Board meetings, chairs executive sessions of the independent directors, and performs the other duties either specified in these guidelines or assigned from time to time by the Board.  In addition, when appropriate, the Lead Director will be available for consultation with shareholders.
  10. Other Boards and Committees. Without specific approval from the Board, no director may serve on more than five public company boards (including the Company's Board) and no member of the Audit Committee may serve on more than three public company audit committees (including the Company's Audit Committee). In addition, directors who also serve as CEOs or in equivalent positions generally should not serve on more than two public company boards, including the Company's Board, in addition to their employer's board. In calculating service on a public company board or audit committee, service on a board or audit committee of a parent and its substantially owned subsidiary counts as service on a single board or audit committee. Any Audit Committee member's service on more than three public company audit committees will be subject to the Board's determination that the member is able to effectively serve on the Company's Audit Committee and the disclosure of that determination in the Company's annual proxy statement. The Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board will take into account the nature of and time involved in a director's service on other boards in evaluating the suitability of individual directors and making its recommendations to Company shareholders. Service on boards and/or committees of other organizations should be consistent with the Company's conflict of interest policies.
Board Meetings; Involvement of Senior Management and Independent Advisors
  1. Board Meetings – Frequency. The Board will generally hold four regularly scheduled in-person meetings per year and holds additional special meetings as necessary. In addition, the Board generally holds informal meetings quarterly to review and discuss the Company’s business performance.  Directors are expected to attend meetings, except if unusual circumstances make attendance impractical.
  2. Board Meetings – Agenda. The Lead Independent Director, or the Chairman of the Board if there is no Lead Independent Director, coordinates with the CEO and corporate secretary to set the agenda for each Board meeting, taking into account suggestions from other members of the Board.
  3. Advance Distribution of Materials. All information relevant to the Board’s understanding of matters to be discussed at an upcoming Board meeting should be distributed in advance of the meeting to all members whenever feasible and appropriate.  Each director is expected to review this information in advance to facilitate the efficient use of meeting time.  In preparing this information, management should ensure that the materials distributed are as concise as possible, yet give directors sufficient information to make informed decisions.  The Board recognizes that certain items to be discussed at Board meetings are of an extremely sensitive nature and that the distribution of materials on these matters prior to Board meetings may not be appropriate.
  4. Access to Employees. The Board should have access to Company employees to ensure that directors can ask all questions and glean all information necessary to fulfill their duties. The Board may specify a protocol for making such inquiries. Management is encouraged to invite Company personnel to any Board meeting at which their presence and expertise would help the Board have a full understanding of matters being considered.
  5. Access to Independent Advisors. The Board and its committees have the right at any time to retain independent outside auditors and financial, legal, or other advisors. The Company will provide appropriate funding, as determined by the Board or any committee, to compensate those independent outside auditors or advisors, as well as to cover the ordinary administrative expenses incurred by the Board and its committees in carrying out their duties.
  6. Compensation Consultant Independence. The Compensation Committee has sole authority to retain and terminate compensation consultants that advise the Compensation Committee, as it deems appropriate, including sole authority to approve the consultants’ fees and other retention terms.  It is the policy of the Compensation Committee that any compensation consultant retained by the Compensation Committee must be independent of Company management.  A consultant satisfying the Company’s Compensation Consultant Independence Standards will be considered independent for purposes of this policy.  The Compensation Committee will also evaluate the independence of legal and other advisors it retains in accordance with applicable regulation and listing standards. 
  7. Executive Sessions of Independent Directors. At each quarterly Board meeting, time is set aside for the independent directors to meet in executive session without Company management present.  Additional executive sessions may be held as needed.  Executive sessions of the independent directors will be called and chaired by the Lead Independent Director, or the Chairman of the Board if there is no Lead Independent Director.  These executive session discussions may include such topics as the independent directors determine.
Communications with Shareholders
  1. Shareholder Communications to the Board. Shareholders may contact an individual director, the Board as a group, or a specified Board committee or group, including the independent directors as a group, by the following means:
    • Mail:  MSC 123/9999
      Corporate Secretary
      Microsoft Corporation
      One Microsoft Way
      Redmond, WA 98052-6399
    • E-mail:
    Each communication should specify the applicable addressee or addressees to be contacted as well as the general topic of the communication. The Company will initially receive and process communications before forwarding them to the addressee.
    Communications also may be referred to other departments within the Company. The Company generally will not forward to the directors a communication that it determines to be primarily commercial in nature or related to an improper or irrelevant topic, or that requests general information about the Company.
    Concerns about questionable accounting or auditing matters or possible violations of the Microsoft Standards of Business Conduct should be reported pursuant to the procedures outlined in the Standards of Business Conduct, which are available on the Company's Web site at
  2. Attendance at Annual Shareholder Meeting. Directors are encouraged to attend the Company's annual meeting of shareholders.
Performance Evaluation; Development and Succession Planning
  1. Annual CEO Evaluation. The Chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committee leads the Governance and Nominating Committee in conducting a review of the performance of the CEO at least annually.  The Governance and Nominating Committee establishes the evaluation process for reviewing the CEO’s performance.  The evaluation results are reviewed and discussed with the independent directors, and the results are communicated to the CEO.
  2. Development and Succession Planning. A primary responsibility of the Board is planning for CEO succession and overseeing the identification and development of executive talent.  The Board, with the assistance of the Compensation Committee and working with the CEO and human resources department, oversees executive officer development and corporate succession plans for the CEO and other executive officers to provide for continuity in senior management.
    The Board works with the CEO to plan for CEO succession.  The succession plan covers identification of internal candidates, development plans for internal candidates, and as appropriate identification of external candidates.  The Board annually reviews the CEO succession plan.  The criteria used to assess potential CEO candidates are formulated based on the Company’s business strategies, and include strategic vision, leadership, and operational execution.
    The Board maintains an emergency succession contingency plan should an unforeseen event such as death or disability occur that prevents the CEO from continuing to serve.  The plan identifies the individuals who would act in an emergency and their responsibilities.  The contingency plan is reviewed by the Board annually and revised as appropriate.
    The Board may review development and succession planning more frequently as it deems necessary or desirable.
  3. Board and Committee Self-Evaluation. The Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for conducting an annual evaluation of the performance of the Board and each of its members.  In addition, each committee is responsible for conducting an annual performance evaluation.  Evaluation results are reported to the Board.  The Governance and Nominating Committee’s report should generally include an assessment of the Board’s compliance with the principles set forth in these guidelines, as well as identification of areas in which the Board could improve its performance.  Each committee’s report generally should include an assessment of the committee’s compliance with the principles set forth in these guidelines and the committee’s charter, as well as identification of areas in which the committee could improve its performance.
  1. Board Compensation Review. Generally, the Board believes that the level of director compensation should be based on time spent carrying out Board and committee responsibilities and be competitive with comparable companies. In addition, the Board believes that a significant portion of director compensation should align director interests with the long-term interests of shareholders. Company management should periodically report to the Board how the Company's director compensation practices compare with those of other large public corporations. The Board should make changes in its director compensation practices only upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, and following discussion and unanimous concurrence by the Board.
  2. Director Stock Ownership. The Board believes that, in order to align the interests of directors and shareholders, directors should have a significant financial stake in the Company.  Each director should own shares equal in value to a minimum of three times the base annual retainer payable to a director and this ownership level should be achieved within five years after the director becomes a Board member.  Stock deferred under a non-qualified deferred compensation arrangement will count towards the minimum ownership requirement.  The Board will evaluate whether exceptions should be made for any director on whom this requirement would impose a financial hardship.
  1. Number and Type of Committees. The Board has four committees – an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Governance and Nominating Committee, and a Regulatory and Public Policy Committee.  The Board may add new committees or remove existing committees as it deems advisable in the fulfillment of its responsibilities.  Each committee will perform its duties as assigned by the Board in compliance with Company Bylaws and the committee’s charter.
  2. Composition of Committees; Committee Chairpersons. The Audit, Compensation, Governance and Nominating, and Regulatory and Public Policy committees consist solely of independent directors.  The Board is responsible for the appointment of committee members and committee chairs according to criteria that it determines to be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders. The full Board considers periodic rotation of committee members and chairs, taking into account the desirability of rotation of committee members and chairs, the benefits of continuity and experience, and applicable legal, regulatory and stock exchange listing requirements.
  3. Committee Meetings and Agenda. The chair of each committee is responsible for developing, together with relevant Company managers, the committee’s general agenda and objectives and for setting the specific agenda for committee meetings.  The chair and committee members will determine the frequency and length of committee meetings consistent with the committee’s charter.
  1. Director Orientation and Continuing Education. The Governance and Nominating Committee and management are responsible for director orientation programs and for director continuing education programs to assist directors in maintaining skills necessary or appropriate for the performance of their responsibilities.
    • Orientation programs are designed to familiarize new directors with the Company's businesses, strategies, and policies and to assist new directors in developing the skills and knowledge required for their service.
    • Continuing education programs for Board members may include a combination of internally developed materials and presentations, programs presented by third parties at the Company, and financial and administrative support for attendance at qualifying university or other independent programs.
  2. Review of Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Board expects to review these guidelines at least every two years, as appropriate.