Microsoft Certified Architect: Review Board Process

Microsoft Certified Architect: Review Board Process

The Review Board interview is the cornerstone of Microsoft Certified Architect (MCA) certification. It provides experienced consultants the opportunity to demonstrate their technical expertise and business acumen to an appointed committee of industry experts. MCA candidates who successfully demonstrate their mastery of seven select competencies to the Review Board earn their MCA certification and entrance into the exclusive MCA community.

Level:

Successful candidates generally have ten or more years of IT experience and five or more years of specific architectural experience. Microsoft Certified Master certification is a prerequisite for all MCA Technology certifications.

Audience:

Practicing IT Architect, Microsoft Certified Master

Type:

Microsoft Certification

During the Review Board interview, the candidate's skills and qualifications are measured against seven competencies and ranked on skill maturity:

Skill Level 0 – The candidate does not exhibit the competency.
Skill Level 1 – The candidate exhibits a basic level of competency.
Skill Level 2 – The candidate exhibits partially developed skills in the competency.
Skill Level 3 – The candidate exhibits fully developed skills in the competency.
Skill Level 4 – The candidate exhibits mastery in the competency.

The seven competencies are explained in the following list.

Leadership is the demonstrated ability to articulate a compelling vision of change and to encourage others into action to achieve that vision. Leaders mentor others and establish trust with partners and stakeholders. They achieve successful results in areas of uncertainty by being proactive, and by foreseeing and mitigating difficulties. Leaders are catalysts for positive change. Criteria include the following:

  • Ask thought-provoking questions that translate into actionable technological patterns and solutions

  • Actively mentor other technology enthusiasts

  • Generate creative thinking that highlights a different and better perspective

  • Influence decision makers

  • Champion structure, process, best practices, and standards

  • Promote the acquisition and reuse of intellectual capital

  • Effectively build mutual partnerships and networks with organizations or other groups

Technology depth includes a detailed knowledge of the concepts, application, and issues of at least two depth competencies, and the ability to assimilate information about new technologies quickly. Examples of depth competencies include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Security

  • Networking

  • Operations and health management

  • Enterprise storage

  • Systems management

  • Messaging

  • Virtualization

Technology breadth is an understanding of best practices in architecture and the ability to apply them across a breadth of messaging or database technologies to create a solution. Successful candidates have a vision of the future development of a technology and how it might influence current solutions. Additionally, they must be able to:

  • Wisely use best practices in architecture

  • Demonstrate a conceptual knowledge of multiple messaging or database technologies and components

  • Anticipate future innovations in technology and how they might be managed

Strategy relates to an understanding of project and operational frameworks and ability to use these frameworks in projects. Successful candidates understand project management principals and how architects interact with project managers and stakeholders (such as business management and IT staff) to deliver successful projects. In addition, they understand the economic aspect of projects, such as how expenses influence the possible technology choices. They must also demonstrate their ability to:

  • Synthesize industry-specific trends in IT

  • Provide operational excellence and operational frameworks, such as the Microsoft Operations Framework (MOF) and the Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL)

  • Demonstrate IT project portfolio management (ensure that the project fits business needs), while balancing tactical requirements against strategic requirements

  • Balance the requirements of the users, management, operations, support, and finance to address the strategic needs of the business successfully

  • Apply and integrate the value of project management frameworks and best practices, such as Microsoft Solutions Framework (MSF) and Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK)

Organization dynamics consist of the ability to recognize and work with key stakeholders to guide a project to a successful conclusion. Successful candidates demonstrate the ability to negotiate and compromise, recognize the political landscape that influences a project throughout an organization, and influence organizational politics for the success of their projects. They must also demonstrate their ability to:

  • Adeptly maneuver through politically-charged organizational situations

  • Effectively build mutually-beneficial partnerships and networks with organizations or other groups

  • Maintain cooperative working relationships with architects and project stakeholders

  • Understand the internal legal organization and ensure that legal guidelines are met

  • Manage compromise and conflict with composure

Process and tactics encompass the ability to gather and refine project requirements from both a technical and business perspective. Successful candidates understand how to prototype and test a solution effectively, and display their talent to create effective project artifacts. They show the ability to support project goals throughout the project. Additional criteria include the ability to:

  • Envision and create an infrastructure that can be implemented and scaled, and that meets customer and legal requirements

  • Model the project infrastructure and manage relationships and communications between project personnel

  • Prototype the design and demonstrate its feasibility

  • Create the design artifacts that are required to deliver and to maintain the infrastructure

  • Oversee the development of an infrastructure through to completion

  • Ensure audit compliance with specifications and the overall purpose of the architecture

  • Monitor the ongoing implementation to identify opportunities for improvement

  • Refine the model as requirements change and as otherwise needed

  • Contribute to technical project management

Communication includes the practice of maintaining well-written and accurate project documentation, the skill required to present information about a technical subject in a concise and measured manner, and the ability to influence others. Successful candidates must also demonstrate their ability to:

  • Effectively listen and astutely observe

  • Communicate persuasively with executives, technical personnel, and others

  • Effectively mediate and manage conflict

  • Document designs and specifications according to company practices

  • Communicate infrastructure constraints to solutions architects

  • Effectively facilitate meetings

The Review Board interview is a scheduled session that takes place in a conference room with a large table, a projection screen, and a white board. The names of Review Board members are not disclosed to candidates before the session. Review Board members are not allowed to answer individual inquiries from candidates until the session is complete and the candidate's certification status has been communicated.

Each session adheres to the following agenda.

Length

Session component

Description

30 minutes

  • Introductions

  • Case study presentation

After introductions are made, the goal of this component is to evaluate the candidate's recent experience in leading a complex project and to demonstrate whether the candidate has sufficient experience in guiding customers to a satisfactory solution.

The candidate is expected to present pertinent topics from a real-life customer engagement. Use the following list as a guide when preparing your presentation.

  • Overview

  • Project goals and success criteria

  • Details of initial state

  • Example of a complex technical challenge

  • Example of a political situation or conflict

  • Details of end state

40 minutes

Q&A

The question and answer (Q&A) discussion is an interview that is based on the candidate's case study presentation and resume. The Review Board assesses the candidate's strength across each core competency of the MCA certification.

5 minutes

Break

The candidate leaves the room during the break.

40 minutes

Q&A or role play

The Review Board conducts a second-round Q&A. Alternatively, they may ask the candidate to participate in a role play, in which the Review Board members simulate customer situations that require the advice of a consultant. The role play consists of the following components.

  1. A Review Board member spends the first five minutes explaining the scenario to the candidate, who will assume the role of consultant. To simulate a real-life scenario, the problem is not presented in a clear and precise manner. The acting customer does not know exactly what solution he or she wants, and the consultant is responsible for providing guidance. Each Review Board member plays a customer role that represents a unique stakeholder (such as business client, technical person, or project manager).

  2. The candidate (consultant) spends the next 15 minutes working through the given scenario with the four acting customers.

  3. The candidate has a five-minute break and leaves the room while the Review Board deliberates.

  4. The candidate rejoins the Review Board and resumes the role play for an additional 15 minutes.

The goal of the role play is to test the candidate's ability to perform the following.

  • Ask the right questions in order to understand the overall problem.

  • Define the problem and determine the best way to approach and solve it.

  • Display confidence in leading the customer to a solution. Quickly build trust and display self-confidence.

  • Anticipate risks, based on the scenario.

  • Demonstrate a project-oriented mindset when explaining how to progress from the initial state to the envisioned end state. Effectively communicate major milestones and contingencies during this process.

Communication skills (including listening and questioning) and confidence are essential to the candidate's success in this segment of the process.

5 minutes

Q&A

The candidate makes any additional comments, and the Review Board responds.

30 minutes

Calibration and conclusion

The candidate leaves the room while the Review Board members perform the score and calibration process.

The candidate receives performance results by e-mail within two weeks.

 

View all answers

A.

The candidate-interview portion of the Review Board interview lasts two hours and consists of six separate stages.

A.

The Review Board consists of Microsoft Certified Architects (MCAs). (In the past, known industry experts have also served on the Review Board at the request of Microsoft, but we now allow only current MCAs to serve.) Three Review Board members are from the candidate's domain (either solutions or infrastructure), and the fourth is from the other domain. Review Board members receive training in how to interview and evaluate candidates in an effective, fair, and consistent manner.

A.

The MCA program reimburses travel expenses for Review Board members. Additionally, a stipend is offered to help defray costs for some Review Board members.

A.

No. You may not request that specific Review Board members evaluate you.

A.

We recommend that you thoroughly review the program competencies and the resources provided to you upon entering the MCA program.

A.

No. The only way to obtain the certification is through the Review Board process.

A.

No. The MCA program's technical integrity is based largely on the candidate's technical acumen, which is validated by the Microsoft Certified Master (MCM) credential. Therefore, MCM certification is required for the MCA Technology certifications. Consistent feedback from Certified Master graduates highlights the invaluable experience and community building that Microsoft Certified Masters gain through the MCM program.

A.

To earn the Microsoft Certified Architect credential, you must demonstrate the seven program competencies at the skill-maturity level the certification requires.

A.

We do not require nor do we recommend that you share confidential information with the Review Board. The Review Board members sign a Review Board Agreement, which contains certain confidentiality obligations regarding the program; however, we cannot guarantee that disclosures you make are covered by the Review Board Agreement or will be kept confidential. It is your responsibility to ensure that you share only information that is not confidential and, if it belongs to a third party (for example, an employer or a customer), that you have permission to share.

A.

You will receive the results by e-mail, within two weeks following your interview.

A.

The Review Board will provide feedback by competency, indicating whether you demonstrated each competency during the interview. Additionally, you will receive suggestions on how to improve your skills.

A.

All Review Board decisions are final. However, you may re-attempt the Review Board interview if you meet the requirements (see next question).

A.

You are granted one Review Board interview. If you do not pass, the Review Board will determine whether you are eligible to attempt the interview again and what actions, if any, you must take before your next interview.

A.

At least one member of any given Review Board has served on a previous Review Board. Additionally, Review Board members receive training before they participate. Training includes instruction on how to evaluate candidates consistently.

To prepare for the Microsoft Certified Architect (MCA) Review Board interview and to learn more about the program expectations, view the following video messages from MCAs and MCA program management.