Ensuring appropriate security for branch offices requires the creation of a logical infrastructure that provides appropriate security boundaries and containment of exposures without preventing cross-organizational access. To do this requires examining the tradeoffs associated with the design options for each service. Tradeoffs are generally tied to the following:
Centralization of services in a hub site generally means that the services are run in a secure central facility with controlled access and well-defined enforcement methods, often with a dedicated security team responsible for the prevention and detection of security problems. This facilitates the enforcement of security policies and helps minimize security risks. Security in branch offices is often limited by the lack of consistent security procedures and dedicated security personnel and more open physical access, sometimes with the potential for many people to have access to the physical computer. This can make it extremely challenging to effectively secure branch data and other branch resources, as well as any corporate data and resources shared with or replicated to the branch office. Placing services in a hub site does introduce the potential for exposure of data traveling between the hub site and the branch office, but the sophistication of technologies available to encrypt network traffic can sufficiently mitigate this risk. Other security considerations and tradeoffs exist for individual services and business requirements. Creating a branch design that provides appropriate security requires creating a detailed security plan that identifies potential security risks and outlines mitigation strategies. | In This Article
|