Many SaaS companies blend pricing strategies, such as freemium access with tiered or usage-based pricing, to create a funnel that attracts a broad set of audiences. Combining models often better reflects how customers experience value, but it must be done strategically. Some organizations still make pricing mistakes that blur positioning, such as underpricing, offering too many tiers, or overlooking churn signals. A more strategic approach adapts pricing across the customer lifecycle, using low-friction entry points for new users, values-aligned tiers as usage grows, and addons or usage-based components for mature accounts with more specialized needs based pricing, friction entry points for new users, value aligned tiers as usage grows, and addons or usage based components for mature accounts with more specialized needs.
Thoughtful combinations of pricing models, paired with lifecycle-aware adjustments, can strengthen market fit and support long-term revenue performance. Microsoft Azure, for example, is a SaaS product that features subscription, freemium, tiered, and usage-based pricing elements to drive expansion and better match customer value. A new user may start with the free tier and experiment with always free services. As soon as they start building, they may naturally need more compute, security features, or governance—at which point they enable a pay as you go subscription. Customers can scale resources up or down, move into higher service tiers as their needs mature, and eventually adopt reserved instances or enterprise agreements as workloads become mission critical.
GitHub also follows a similar freemium plus tiered approach by offering a free version and as well as GitHub Enterprise. Developers may start with a free account, but as their team adds GitHub into their daily workflow and increases usage, they may need more advanced features such as compliance, audit logs, advanced code scanning, and higher CI/CD limits—pushing them to upgrade to the Team plan or GitHub Enterprise.