An Empirical Analysis of Backward Compatibility in Machine Learning Systems
In many applications of machine learning (ML), updates are performed with the goal of enhancing model performance. However, current practices for updating models rely solely on isolated, aggregate performance analyses, overlooking important dependencies, expectations, and needs in real-world deployments. We consider how updates, intended to improve ML models, can introduce new errors that can significantly affect downstream systems and users. For example, updates in models used in cloud-based classification services, such as image recognition, can cause unexpected erroneous behavior in systems that make calls to the services. Prior work has shown the importance of “backward compatibility” for maintaining human trust. We study challenges with backward compatibility across different ML architectures and datasets, focusing on common settings including data shifts with structured noise and ML employed in inferential pipelines. Our results show that (i) compatibility issues arise even without data shift due to optimization stochasticity, (ii) training on large-scale noisy datasets often results in significant decreases in backward compatibility even when model accuracy increases, and (iii) distributions of incompatible points align with noise bias, motivating the need for compatibility aware de-noising and robustness methods.
Backward Compatibility ML
September 10, 2020
The Backward Compatibility ML library is an open-source project for evaluating AI system updates in a new way for increasing system reliability and human trust in AI predictions for actions. This project’s series of loss functions provides important metrics that extend beyond the single score of accuracy. These support ML practitioners in navigating performance and tradeoffs in system updates. The functions integrate easily into existing AI model-training workflows. Simple visualizations, such as Venn diagrams, further help practitioners compare models and explore performance and compatibility tradeoffs for informed choices.